The only that an user like me can see it works for esp32c2 is this one.
[e32c2]
extends = env:arduino
platform = GitHub - Jason2866/platform-espressif32: Tasmota Espressif 32: development platform for PlatformIO
It’s not pioarduino but it’s your fork. I was relying on the above for quite awhile and had to keep both e32pio and e32c2 platforms. This e32c2 can say it SUPPORTS c2.
The C2 boards manifest was missing the needed entry for Hybrid Compile.
In CI run for the C2 this entry is set in Platformio C2 env.
Changed. It will work as described now in branch develop
platform = https://github.com/pioarduino/platform-espressif32.git#develop
Until a new release is done currently this env C2 entry is needed to compile Arduino code. platform-espressif32/examples/arduino-blink/platformio.ini at 5920b375a85c3f289bfa72cf7e79755b9315cf7d · pioarduino/platform-espressif32 · GitHub
Thx for trying and finding the mismatch.
@jason2866
For the sake of peace, humanity and friendship, it’s not so nice to start off a conversation by “misunderstanding on your side” and “wrong” without even asking why the other has a different view from yours.
Though you may be very good and do very great at something, there is always a chance that something might be missed out, particularly in the world of coding we are in.
@sivar2311
I thought we were talking in private and I thought you are friendly for asking my well-being with regards to my struggle on how to get things done. We may come from different cultures. You would definitely feel better if you were asked for permission before getting others to join your conversation, don’t you?
But anyway, the bright side of this is that there is a nagging issue has been clarified.
@ceewanna Just name the things as the are. Since I know how this works since I have written this code. Don’t ask me again if you can’t live with clear answers.
I didn’t want to hurt your feelings, I just wanted to understand your problems and try to solve them. If this has come across differently to you, I apologize.
This is a public conversation. Unfortunately, you have not replied to my private message.
Json2866 has the greatest understanding of pioarduino, after all he is the author of pioarduino. I think it’s great that he has provided the correct answers to solve your problem.
I also think it was a typical xy-problem.
@jason2866
Well, I named it clear that it didn’t support. Nobody argues that you write the code or not. I had no question and I even expressed appreciation that you make it able to compile.
“What you referred to as “support” in my view is equivalent to saying “it can” compile. I can appreciate that.”
One can live with whatever answer you may give. The implications from the way you answer can be a different issue.
Your “Don’t ask me again” is ironically funny because I didn’t get a chance to ask you anything here at all even though there are a number of other questions I have in mind. The world would be a chaos if developers have this kind of attitude.
Your so called “clear” answers in my view was just a statement or claim that “it supports.” It didn’t answer anything to an end user. However, I did have a “clear” evidence that it didn’t. What is also “clear” is that your conversation indicated the other was “wrong” on no matter what.